2. We thought we were good, but not good enough
In 2012 Here designed and mobilised an integrated service – highly innovative for its time and perhaps even more so today. Between 2013 to 2016 the service delivered improvements in DDR of around 30% and improved patient journey times for Referral to Diagnosis with commissioner set targets of 10 weeks.
As the service continued to surge forward, attaining commissioned journey time targets, there was an increasing narrative that speed was not what all our patients wanted and needed.
We identified there was a gap between commissioned provision and what people required. This learning was painful as despite our best efforts and integrated model, we were not delivering what mattered most to our patients. Diagnosis had been our priority and it was clear that our patients wanted a service that was designed around their priorities and needs, whilst giving them time and support to adjust to the possibility of receiving a diagnosis of a life limiting degenerative disease.
Putting aside our service specification, KPI and system rules we started a process putting our citizens at the heart of our enquiry.
We asked our patients key questions: what was important to them and what mattered most.
Over a 4-month period we conducted a System Thinking enquiry to better understand the needs and experience of the people who used our service. System Thinking analysis requires taking a step back, to investigate whilst looking at the wider picture through a more holistic lens to gain further understanding. Services do not operate in isolation, our healthcare system and the people we serve are complex and multifaceted and our investigation had to acknowledge this.
We also undertook case studies, direct observations, hosted patient and carer focus groups and reviewed the patient journey from referral to discharge. This accounted for approximately 15% of our caseload.
Our key learning was: Of the patients reviewed 70% that were requesting support, diagnosis was not their priority.
In 2017 with the consent of our commissioners, we redesigned our service around patient voice and needs and anchored ourselves to a new purpose created out of the learning from our patients and their loved ones: